Friday 27 June 2014

Pakistan's new battleground


Pakistan's new battleground

Saudi Arabia seeks Pakistan's assistance in the proxy war it is fighting with Iran
Sandeep Unnithan and Qaswar Abbas  June 27, 2014 | UPDATED 15:54 IST
 

Saudi crown prince Salman bin Abdulaziz al Saud (left) with Pakistan
Saudi crown prince Salman bin Abdulaziz al Saud (left) with Pakistan's Nawaz Sharif
On February 15, 2014, Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Salman bin Abdulaziz al Saud and its deputy prime minister and defence minister, were welcomed in Islamabad with a 21-gun salute, rarely accorded to visiting dignitaries. It was the second high-profile Saudi visit in two months after Saudi Foreign Minister Saud al-Faisal's visit to Pakistan in January.
 
 
 
Pakistan's Ministry of External Affairs termed the visits as "opportunities for expanding and improving investment and trade". Prince Salman gave Pakistan a $1.5-billion aid package whose exact objective was never revealed. But as events in Syria and Iraq speedily unfolded, it became clear that the flurry of high-profile visits had to do with the civil war in Syria and Iraq. Saudi Arabia wanted Pakistan's assistance in the proxy war it was fighting with Shia-majority Iran. The Saudi money, it is being speculated, was to buy Pakistani arms for Saudi-funded rebel groups like ISIS.
Joint statements during both visits called for "the formation of a transitional governing body with full executive powers in Syria". Two visits by Pakistani army chief Raheel Sharif to Saudi Arabia in the span of just two months, February and April, underlined a growing military dimension to the relationship. A Pakistan defence ministry official confirmed the sale of "heavy and light weapons" to Saudi Arabia but declined to specify the types. During the Afghan war of 1979-88, Saudi Arabia bankrolled the predominantly Sunni Afghan Mujahideen's fight against a Soviet army of occupation.
Pakistan was then a conduit for funnelling arms and fighters into Afghanistan, just as it could be now in a three-year-old civil war which has torn apart Syria and Iraq. The civil war has created fresh worries for India, which has warily watched ISIS's stunning advance through Iraq. Of particular concern are reports of hundreds of Pakistani militants and former soldiers now bolstering the ranks of ISIS's assortment of Western-born fighters and Iraqi soldiers.
The Pakistani fighters are believed to be retired army personnel and civilians from militant groups like Hafiz Saeed's Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) and the Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LeJ). "Hundreds of our mujahideen have moved to Syria. Others are preparing to join them soon," Abu Wahab, commander of a pro-Pakistan militant group claimed. The groups in Iraq are believed to be from the 'pro-government' groups like LeT and LeJ, and not the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) that attacked Karachi airport on June 8, against which the Pakistan army has now launched an offensive in North Waziristan.
LeT and LeJ have participated in sectarian murders of Shias in Pakistan. A January 2014 report by the Pakistan Institute for Peace Studies noted 687 sectarian killings in the country last year, a 22 per cent increase over 2013.
Ashok Behuria, a research scholar with the New Delhi-based Institute of Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA), warns of the bigger dangers from the ISIS's territorial push and the collapse of the US-trained Iraqi army. "A radical Islamic arc all the way from Africa to West Asia alters the strategic landscape for India, as it boosts the morale of terrorist groups like LeT and al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan," he says. The militant groups could be emboldened to carry out attacks on India, particularly in Jammu & Kashmir and in Indian interests in Afghanistan from where US-led coalition forces will complete their withdrawal later this year, leaving the US-trained Afghan National Army to fight the Pakistan-backed Afghan Taliban.
The Saudi Arabia-Pakistan strategic axis could also impact on India's ties with the Kingdom. Since 2012, Riyadh has deported four terrorists wanted in India, including key 26/11 controller Abu Jundal. Indian diplomats recently reached out to the Saudis to help free Indian hostages held prisoner by Sunni insurgent groups in Mosul. This close relationship could undergo a sea change if Pakistan's ties with Saudi Arabia gather steam.
West Asia's brutal sectarian civil war now shows signs of becoming the Afghan conflict of the 21st century, primarily for its ability to attract a steady stream foreign fighters. The Pakistan foreign ministry is yet to impose travel restrictions on its nationals visiting Syria or Iraq, a move that could stem the flow of volunteers attracted by the ISIS's subversive social media recruitment campaign.
Major (retired) Agha Amin, a Lahore-based defence analyst, believes that Pakistani fighters went into Syria and Iraq with the tacit knowledge of the government. He mentioned Lt-General Hamid Gul, former chief of Pakistan's spy agency ISI between 1987 and 1989, as a key facilitator in the movement. The Pakistan army has refused to send serving troops or trainers into Syria and Iraq as this would be a clear violation of international law. The army has, however, supported Lt-General Hamid Gul's efforts to take former Pakistani soldiers to Iraq and Syria. "There is a strong possibility that the Mosul attack was supported by the Pakistani state, both civilian and military," Major Amin says.
Leaked US diplomatic cables in 2010, published by the website Wiki-Leaks, named Gul as being close to both al Qaeda and the Afghan Taliban. Interestingly, Lt-General Gul has headed Pakistan's ex-servicemen's association since September last year. The former ISI chief dismisses reports about the presence of Pakistanis in Iraq and his alleged role in sending them there. "I don't think there are any Pakistani fighters in Syria and Iraq. This sounds like propaganda from the West and India," he told India Today.
Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's Foreign Affairs Adviser Sartaj Aziz, however, termed reports of a Saudi-Pakistan military nexus as "misleading" and "rubbish". "Both countries stressed on the need to resolve the Syrian conflict according to the Geneva Resolutions," Aziz told INDIA TODAY. Ordinary Pakistanis, however, react with dread at the prospect of their involvement in yet another civil war. On June 13, Pakistani author Mohammed Hanif tweeted, "Uzbeks in Karachi, Pakistanis in Mosul. Is this what Allama Iqbal meant by Neel ke sahil se le kar, Ta Ba khak-e Kashgar (from the banks of the Nile to the deserts of Kashgar)". The approaching sounds of another distant war.
Follow the writer onTwitter @SandeepUnnithan
For more news from India Today, follow us on Twitter @indiatoday and on Facebook atfacebook.com/IndiaToday
For news and videos in Hindi, go to AajTak.in. ताज़ातरीन ख़बरों और वीडियो के लिए आजतक.इन पर आएं.
 
DO YOU LIKE THIS STORY?   0

<

Friday 13 June 2014

AAPeclipse cover and the Hollywood inspiration.


AAPeclipse


AAPECLIPSE

Arvind Kejriwal and AAP stare at infighting, an exodus of cadres and dwindling finances
Sandeep Unnithan  NA, June 13, 2014 | UPDATED 11:39 IST
 

<a href="http://indiatoday.intoday.in/people/arvind-kejriwal/17736.html">Arvind Kejriwal</a>. Photo by Reuben Singh
Arvind Kejriwal. Photo by Reuben Singh
On June 5, Abhishek Shukla, 29, a former IT professional, met Arvind Kejriwal at his Tilak Lane home in central Delhi. In 2011, Shukla had quit his job as an analyst with Religare to join the anti-corruption movement led by his hero. He became district secretary of the fledgling Aam Aadmi Party's (AAP) Noida chapter and was one of the thousands of volunteers who worked for the party during the Delhi Assembly and Lok Sabha elections. Shattered by the magnitude of the defeat-AAP won just four of the 434 Lok Sabha seats it contested-and disappointed by the emergence of a powerful coterie around Kejriwal, he told the party chief he was quitting. The AAP leader, sitting in his lawn, his lips pursed and his stance defensive, was unmoved. "Where were you when we won 28 seats in Delhi?" he shot back. Shukla wanted to know why the party did not win in the remaining 42 Assembly seats. The discussion was inconclusive. The young party worker left, disillusioned.
In his lowest moment, a defeated Kejriwal is making a desperate bid to stay relevant after his party's rout in the Lok Sabha polls, masking disappointment in bravado. His party is bleeding volunteers across the country. From 350,000 volunteers nationwide last October, it's now down to less than 50,000. In Delhi alone, party sources say, over half their original strength of 15,000 volunteers have quit. The party is losing money-public contributions to the party coffers have shrunk from a peak of Rs.30 lakh a day in April to a few thousand rupees daily in June.
The party's anti-corruption helplines that attracted thousands of phone calls and emails each day, have fallen silent. Worse, its leaders are at war with one another citing the very ills AAP accuses other parties of-cult of the leader and the grip of a coterie. Founder-member Shazia Ilmi quit alleging a clique around Kejriwal. Party strategist Yogendra Yadav offered to resign from the party's Political Affairs Committee alleging a growing personality cult in a letter dated May 31. As if this public airing of disaffection was not enough, Manish Sisodia, Kejriwal's closest aide, hit back on June 5, blaming Yadav for the decision to contest elections across the country and the abysmal showing in Haryana, where Yadav was in charge.
Soon after the May 16 debacle, the party has opened back-channel negotiations with the Congress state leadership. AAP aims to resurrect the 49-day coalition government Kejriwal walked out of on February 14. The move, AAP workers say, is because the party is not confident of retaining its 28 Assembly seats against a revitalised BJP.
Kejriwal spent May 16, the day of results, closeted in a Vipassana meditation camp in Haryana. He then got together with close advisers like Yadav and Sisodia and finally swung into damage-control mode. On June 8, he called for a three-day National Executive meeting, which party workers called a charade.

AAP's stunning performance in the Delhi Assembly polls had lowered the entry barrier into politics. Just six months later though, party workers are challenging the leadership. "Who will take responsibility for the defeat," angry cries went up at a May 26 meeting of party workers and volunteers at Delhi's Constitution Club.
Some of this angst stems from the changing public perception of the party. From being the middle-class messiah and the face of the common man's anger against UPA last year, Kejriwal and the party are now staring at a 'what-next?' abyss. The feeling is not new. The Janata Party faced it in 1977 after it vanquished Indira Gandhi. V.P. Singh confronted it after he swept to power at the head of another fractious coalition in 1989 defeating Rajiv Gandhi.
Except, Kejriwal does not have the luxury of victory. A fourth generation Nehru-Gandhi was swept aside and the Congress party reduced to near-irrelevance. But the victor was not the slightly built man with the moustache, baggy shirts and sandals who first lit the fire of public anger against the UPA's corruption on the streets of Delhi in 2011. It was the impeccably dressed, three-term Gujarat chief minister with the "56-inch" chest. "AAP was the result of a popular movement against corruption. For it to regroup, after the object of that outrage has gone, is a tough task," says columnist and social commentator Santosh Desai. The Lok Sabha overstretch grievously hurt the party: 414 AAP candidates, or nearly 96 per cent, lost their deposit.
The party increased its vote share from 29 per cent to 33 per cent in its bastion Delhi but lost all seven seats to BJP. What's more, the party's street theatre has hit the law of diminishing returns. On May 21, Kejriwal refused to post a Rs.10,000 bail bond and was sent to Tihar Jail for a fortnight. The Congress and BJP termed it a publicity stunt. Only a handful of party workers and MLAs gathered outside Tihar's gate no. 1 on May 27 as Kejriwal quietly posted bail and went home after six days in Tihar.
Coterie vs cadres
The desolation is everywhere. AAP's two-storeyed party office in Kaushambi, Ghaziabad, that once buzzed with volunteers, is deserted. There is only a trickle of party workers at AAP's nerve centre, a two-storeyed building in Hanuman Mandir lane near Connaught Place. A month ago, the building was teeming with volunteers: Professionals, former government servants and social activists who were electrified by Kejriwal's anti-corruption movement. The AAP spring last year surged on the backs of this volunteer army of over 300,000 who campaigned door to door tirelessly, exhorting people to vote for the party. There will be fewer volunteers to do that the next time the party gives the call for elections.
One AAP functionary says funds to maintain the party are down to a trickle. The party had aimed to crowdsource Rs.200 crore to fight the Lok Sabha elections; it got only Rs.35 crore. "Most of the candidates were left to fend for themselves, they did not even put up a poster or step out of their homes to campaign," says an AAP worker. A handful of corporates who wanted to donate to the party shied away when they realised that their names would be posted on the AAP website.

Volunteers are in desertion mode. Sisodia doesn't deny volunteers are leaving but says more are joining. Those who are left chafe at the lack of transparency and inner-party democracy. "We preach Swaraj to the people, we aren't willing to implement it within the party," says a senior AAP functionary in Delhi. "We don't know how this small coterie-Manish Sisodia, Yogendra Yadav, Sanjay Singh and Ashish Talwar-made their way into the 22-member National Executive. They act as a wall between party workers and Arvind Kejriwal," says a party worker. Party workers warn AAP could well turn into another version of personality cult-driven parties like Mayawati's BSP or Mamata Banerjee's Trinamool Congress. The National Executive meeting failed to address the issue of inner-party democracy. What was handed out as panacea was 'Mission Vistaar', an expansion of the National Executive and the Political Affairs Committee.
Asked about AAP's weaknesses, Kiran Bedi, former IPS officer and a member of the India Against Corruption, who parted ways with Kejriwal, has a long list: "Total impatience. Unpreparedness, overreach, unilaterlism, manipulation, over-exposure, over-estimation, negativism, holier-than-thou-approach, overconfidence, lawlessness, rowdyism, self-centredness, uncivil behaviour."
The discontent within the party began over ticket distribution-AAP members say they were never given clear reasons on what basis tickets for the Delhi Assembly polls were distributed. It snowballed by the time of the Lok Sabha elections. In January, AAP's political executive took upon itself the power to hand out tickets to candidates. Winnability became the key as a series of new leaders paradropped into the party. Sisodia, however, denies the charge. "If we had contested only 15-20 Lok Sabha seats as we originally planned, we would never have got the four seats in Punjab and expanded the party across the country. We have now brought over 100 new leaders like Medha Patkar into the party," he says.
But the impact of the leadership squabble is being felt among workers and volunteers across the country. In Karnataka, another state where Kejriwal promised deliverance from corruption, the party is evaporating. India's low-cost aviation pioneer Captain Gopinath has resigned from the party; former Infosys CFO V. Balakrishnan, who lost the parliamentary polls from Bangalore Central, maintains a low profile while others such as child rights activist Nina Nayak and social activist Ruth Manorama have distanced themselves from the party. AAP's Bangalore-based National Executive member, Prithvi Reddy, admits the leadership crisis had affected the party's declining cadres. "When parents quarrel, the impact is felt on the children," he says.
AAP's lack of a formal party structure is proving to be debilitating. In Punjab, where it recorded a surprise performance grabbing four seats and 24.4 per cent vote share in the Lok Sabha elections, the party organisation is yet to take root. "I keep abreast of developments within the party only by watching the Delhi media," says Chanchal Singh Gill, ex-serviceman and AAP volunteer in Anandpur Sahib.
In search of an ideology
Political observers say AAP's current existential crisis flows from the lack of a core ideology. "Kejriwal became the face of public anger against UPA. But you cannot be permanently angry and anti-corruption alone cannot be an ideology," says Pawan Khera, erstwhile political secretary to former Delhi CM Sheila Dikshit. As Yogendra Yadav's letter shows, the party turned oblivious to a pressing need-to formulate and proclaim its position on key policy issues. Citing a "serious deficit in policy thinking", he wrote there was no progress beyond an early policy document drafted prior to the Delhi elections.
Sociologist Dipankar Gupta, who has been an avid admirer of AAP's "refreshingly new brand of politics", says it is now time for the party to step beyond "the angry stuffy crowds". "AAP needs to set a direction for itself," he says. AAP workers say the party lurched from anti-corruption to anti-communalism before coming back to its original plank.
Sure, ideological shifts are not new to Indian politics. Anti-corruption messiah V.P. Singh found his second calling by championing the cause of backward castes through the Mandal reservations. Kejriwal's quest has just begun. "What you are seeing is a party in search of a new ideology, it only remains to be seen what that is-whether corruption or criminalisation of politics," says Santosh Desai.
Sisodia reaffirms the party's commitment to Swaraj and the Jan Lokpal Bill. But these are premised on deep mistrust of the existing bureaucracy, something completely at odds with the new Narendra Modi model of governance that relies wholly on getting the existing bureaucratic machinery to work. The party's Swaraj Bill or self-rule bill promised to transfer power to the people through mohalla sabhas. This was stubbornly resisted by bureaucrats in the Delhi government, who say they were humiliated by Kejriwal's ministers and successfully killed the AAP's initiatives of power subsidies and the Swaraj Bill as soon as the party demitted office. The message-bureaucrats don't mind working, but not as adversaries.

At a crossroads
Looming in the distance is AAP's biggest challenge: Fresh elections to the Delhi Assembly likely to be held between November and December. AAP's entire crop of 28 MLAs has held over 200 mohalla sabhas in the recent past, a desperate rearguard action to hold on to their seats. MLAs are holding up to seven meetings a week to know how best they can spend their Rs.4-crore local area development fund. "We hope to win a majority this time," says Sisodia. AAP leaders say the party is as yet undecided about contesting elections in Haryana and Maharashtra but will certainly work on a strategy to oust the ruling Shiromani Akali Dal-BJP combine in Punjab.
For AAP, the real challenge lies in filling the Opposition space vacated by the shrinking Left Front and Congress.
Despite its flaws, not even one of AAP's harshest critics is willing to either write off the party or Kejriwal. Anti-corruption patriarch Anna Hazare says Kejriwal's clean image and record of tireless public service could prove to be an asset. "Kejriwal is still held in high esteem by the public for his probity and integrity, whatever his other faults may be. The party can still bounce back if Kejriwal can demonstrate what AAP stands for," says Captain Gopinath.
For that, Kejriwal now has to find a new battle and rebuild his army. Only then can he win the war for the hearts and minds of India's ever-vigilant voters.
- With Asit Jolly and Aravind Gowda
Follow the writer on Twitter @SandeepUnnithan
To read more, get your copy of India Today here.

Friday 6 June 2014

Arun Jaitley's defence dilemma


Arun Jaitley's defence dilemma: faces  task of balancing two portfolios with ease

Sandeep Unnithan  NA, June 6, 2014 | UPDATED 18:37 IST

<a href="http://indiatoday.intoday.in/people/arun-jaitley/19435.html">Arun Jaitley</a>
Arun Jaitley
On May 27, just hours before Arun Jaitley was to take over as defence minister in South Block, a MiG-21 fighter jet of the Indian Air Force plunged out of the sky in Jammu and Kashmir's Anantnag district, killing the young pilot who parachuted onto high-tension wires.
The incident rang yet another alarm bell on one of IAF's cruellest dilemmas: It has no choice but to continue operating over 200 vintage MiG-21s designed in the 1950s. The UPA government sat on a proposal to buy 126 Rafale aircraft for two years after the French fighter beat competitors from the US, Russia and Sweden to win the world's largest military deal valued at Rs.42,000 crore in 2011. Then it was time for elections and the UPA regime focused on doling out subsidies of overRs.200,000 crore. Then defence minister A.K. Antony pointed to the Tejas Light Combat Aircraft as an alternative for Rafale. The indigenous plane, however, is yet to enter combat service, even three decades after the project began. "The first LCA Mk-I squadron will be operational only by 2016-17 while the Mark 2 version that actually meets IAF's operational requirements is still on the drawing board at HAL (Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd). So the numbers required to replace MiG-21s are at least a decade away," says retired air vice marshal Manmohan Bahadur of the Delhi-based Centre for Air Power Studies.
Costly low-hanging fruit
Now, the task has fallen on Jaitley. He is the only finance minister ever to also hold the defence portfolio and, thereby, in charge of the country's economic as well as external security. Even if the ministry is a temporary charge "only for a few weeks", as he said, Jaitley has to wrestle with a dilemma. On the one hand, he will have to send proposals to the finance ministry and, on the other, he has to find resources to pay for them in the Union Budget due in the first week of July. That's no mean task. India's current growth rate of 4.7 per cent is the lowest in 25 years. Inflation stands at 8.6 per cent and fiscal deficit-the amount that the government borrows for its working-is over 4.5 per cent of GDP.
Piled on Jaitley's table are pending files on critical but costly replacements for India's antiquated war machine, including MiG-21s, dubbed 'flying coffins' as an alarming number have crashed; 12 in the past five years alone. That much of this hardware is desperately needed is beyond doubt, for it is critical to India's defence preparedness. The army aviation corps pilots, for instance, still fly 120 Cheetah light utility helicopters, literally to the edge of their endurance and service lives, to take supplies to soldiers at the high-altitude posts in Siachen. Like the MiG-21, the Cheetah was designed in the 1950s. A replacement has been delayed by over a decade. There is a need for M777 howitzers for the army's artillery corps, which has not imported a gun since the Bofors scandal over a quarter century ago. At least 10 of the pending proposals worth over Rs.66,894 crore are what the Modi Government calls "low-hanging fruit". These have completed technical evaluations, the penultimate stage before the military and the bureaucracy can sit down with foreign contractors to negotiate prices. Representatives of French jet-maker Dassault have held some 500 meetings with HAL in the past two years, and believe they could sign the contract for the Rafale fighter before the end of this financial year.
A series of such off-the-shelf buys could allow the NDA Government to see through its twin manifesto pledges of modernising the armed forces and fast-tracking defence purchases. Under the UPA government, defence acquisitions had stalled, particularly after charges of corruption in the 2010 purchase of 12 AgustaWestland VVIP helicopters cast questions on the role of several key officials in the deal. The Modi Government's recent directives to empower the bureaucracy could get the acquisitions going again. "If the message goes down the line, then the bureaucracy will be encouraged to speed up decisions," says former defence secretary Ajai Vikram Singh.
Little room for manoeuvre
Attractive as they may be, the defence deals will come at a heavy price. They will reinforce India's position as the world's largest buyer of military hardware, a dubious distinction it has held since 2010. Nearly half the Rs.57,796 crore that India sets aside for military equipment is spent on imports. It imports 14 per cent of the world's arms, nearly three times that of nearest competitors Pakistan and China.
Signing all 10 pending deals will mean the Government will pay foreign firms at least 15 per cent of the cost, or Rs.10,000 crore, upfront. Delays have escalated hardware costs. The defence ministry, for instance, budgeted aboutRs 42,000 crore in 2007 for buying 126 fighter aircraft in 2005. But the cost in 2014 could go up as high as Rs.100,000 crore, with each Rafale costing about Rs.590 crore. This means the Government will have to find additional funds since the defence budget has seen only a modest growth of 5 per cent each year. "With inflation at 8 per cent, this means the defence budget has actually been shrinking in real terms," says Laxman Kumar Behera of the Institute of Defence Studies and Analyses, Delhi.
Jaitley's challenge, therefore, will be to balance a Rs.230,000-crore budget that is traditionally skewed towards manpower costs rather than acquiring new hardware. India spends nearly 66 per cent of its defence budget on salaries of personnel, and only 33 per cent on acquiring equipment. And of the acquisition cost, nearly 90 per cent goes in paying annual instalments for deals already signed. This leaves little cash for fresh acquisitions. So, Jaitley will have to significantly increase the budget. He will have to address another related issue: The defence ministry has ignored a series of proposals for radical restructuring or downsizing to increase its fighting power. Each of the three services still projects its hardware requirements separately. This leads to a huge backlog of acquisitions which the slow-moving ministry is unable to clear.
The minister will also have to make money for the army's gigantic manpower accretion plan: A new mountain strike corps of 90,000 soldiers, nearly the size of the British Army, that will cost Rs.64,700 crore.
Creating indigenous capacity
This year, the Navy hopes to finalise a contract with South Korea's Kangnam shipyard to buy eight sophisticated vessels that can detect and destroy sea mines. This deal, worth Rs.8,800 crore, will be India's largest contract with the Far East Asian nation. South Korea's industry lagged behind India's in the 1970s, but thanks to a farsighted defence policy that roped in the private sector, it has become an arms exporter bidding to sell India jets and howitzers before breaking in with the Kangnam deal. "If there is a country India must swiftly emulate, it's South Korea," says a defence ministry bureaucrat. NDA has promised to boost the indigenous defence industry, including the private sector, which was marginalised under UPA, and raised foreign direct investment in defence from 26 per cent to 100 per cent. This is one reason why the defence budget will be closely watched by the corporate sector. "100 per cent FDI in defence will create jobs, ecosystems, self-reliance and spur technology transfer to India," says Shailesh Pathak, president, corporate strategy, Srei Infrastructure Finance.
However, off-the-shelf purchases could prove counter-productive to the thrust towards indigenisation. Such deals will open the floodgates for more demands from the Navy, Army and the Air Force. Some demands, such as the Navy's for 18 multi-role helicopters, are justified-it has not bought new helicopters for over 20 years and new warships are being inducted without rotorcraft-but others such as importing six conventional submarines worth Rs.36,000 crore under the Project 75 India seem quixotic at a time when Chinese nuclear-powered attack submarines have begun prowling in the Indian Ocean. There are also separate proposals for as many as seven new generation frigates together worth over Rs.48,000 crore that could skewer indigenous defence capability.
Then there are contracts for home- manufactured hardware that may look attractive but add little value to indigenous capability. "It is shameful that despite spending over Rs.23,000 crore to build six Scorpene submarines, we are importing all components including the fire control system," says retired vice admiral K.N. Sushil.
"If India resumes off-the-shelf imports of defence hardware, indigenisation will be set back by decades," warns Rahul Chaudhry, CEO of Tata Power SED. A cheaper and yet unexplored option, he says, will be for the Government to encourage the private sector to buy foreign firms to gain access to technology. At least two Indian firms-Tata Power and Bharat Forge-have bought foreign gun manufacturers and are competing to sell indigenous guns to the Army. Clearly, such out-of-the-box solutions should form part of the finance minister's customary promise in the budget speech: "Constraints will not come in the way of providing any additional requirement for the safety of the nation."
Follow the writer on Twitter @SandeepUnnithan

Thursday 5 June 2014

INS Sindhurakshak lifted from Mumbai harbour floor


INS Sindhurakshak lifted from Mumbai harbour floor in massive salvage operation

Sandeep Unnithan  New Delhi, June 5, 2014 | UPDATED 11:20 IST
 

Chain pullers from two salvage barges lift the submarine lying on the seabed since August last year. Image courtesy: Resolve Marine Group
A salvage firm raised the stricken naval submarine INS Sindhurakshak in Mumbai harbour on Tuesday evening.
Sources say the submarine, which exploded and sank on August 14 last year killing 18 crew members, was slowly lifted from the harbour floor where it lay for nearly 10 months and placed it on a special barge. Indian naval personnel hoisted the naval ensign on the submarine.
The salvage comes ahead of Defence Minister Arun Jaitley's visit to the Mumbai dockyard on Saturday where he will visit aircraft carrier INS Viraat and commission two Coast Guard patrol vessels Achook and Agrim.
An aerial shot of the salvage barges approaching the submarine. Graphic courtesy: Resolve Marine Group

A navy spokesperson would only confirm that the salvage operation was underway. "The entire operation might take between 48 and 72 hours," the spokesperson informed.
A notice on the website of the salvage firm, Resolve Marine, said a team of Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) experts had successfully disarmed live ordnances onboard the submarine. 'Resolve is now planning to use its custom-built chain pullers to raise the submarine and return it to the Indian Navy on a specially modified barge,' the notice said.
An aerial shot of the barges lifting the submarine to the sea surface. Image courtesy: Resolve Marine Group


The salvage of the 2,300- tonne submarine will finally allow the naval Board of Inquiry to move ahead on establishing the cause of the explosion, naval officials said.
The explosion is believed to have originated in one of the forward compartments that contained torpedoes and missiles. The submarine was being loaded with armament when the explosion took place shortly past midnight on August 14.
"By studying the wreckage, torpedoes and missiles, we will know the exact sequence of events that led to the blast," a naval official said.
The striken submarine finally brought to surface. Image courtesy: Resolve Marine Group
SINDHURAKSHAK SALVAGE SEQUENCE:
1.    Two salvage barges approach the sunken submarine.
2.     Chain pullers loop around the hull of the Sindhurakshak.
3.     Submarine lifted above water by salvage barge.
4.     Submarine lowered onto special submersible barge.
5.     Submarine sits on barge.
6.     Barge is then floated. It lifts the submarine.
7.     Submarine brought to surface.
Vice Admiral K.N. Sushil, a veteran submariner and the former Southern Naval commander, says the navy should constitute a special team comprising of naval architects and chemical analysts to minutely study the Sindhurakshak wreckage like forensicologists would study a crime scene. "It is critical to establish the cause of the blast because many of our operational procedures may have to be revised," he says.
The navy awarded the contract to salvage the submarine to Resolve Marine Group, the Indian subsidiary of an American firm, for Rs.240 crore. The salvage is to be completed before the onset of the south-west monsoons this month. It is unlikely the submarine will ever return to service.
What the navy plans to do with the Sindhurakshak:1. Remove silt from the first compartment where torpedoes and missiles were stored. The blast was supposed to have originated here.
2.  Look for clues on what triggered the blast that destroyed the submarine.
3.  Step back and study the damage to reconstruct the sequence of events.